A Modest Proposal To Combine Social Media and Public Relations Into Social Relations

First, a confession.

I’m a PR guy and have been for years.

When I started my career in public relations in the late ‘80s, I imagine the profession was a lot like it was when pioneers like Edward Bernays and Ivy Lee got things started at the turn of the 20th century. Which is to say, it hadn’t advanced all that much. Most people I talk to still associate PR with the same thing they did in the ‘80s: media relations. And the chief weapon in the PR person’s quiver remains the anachronistic press release.

The Century-Old Challenge For Public Relations

It took decades for public relations as a discipline to earn the respect of corporations, namely corporate management. Along the way, PR professionals worked hard to demonstrate the value of comprehensive initiatives aimed at building trust among companies and the “publics” they depend on.

Yet those same pros have remained Rodney Dangerfields within the communications suite, constantly seeking respect among their colleagues. While that respect has largely been earned, the profession as a whole continues to suffer from a lack of understanding and disagreement about what exactly PR is, both among its practitioners and the public at large. Nevertheless, in spite of these issues, public relations is an established, accepted practice.

Social Media: The New Kid On The Block

Now, just when PR people thought they didn’t have enough to contend with, along comes the greatest revolution since the dawn of the Internet: social media. In just a few short years, social media has achieved an unrivaled level of excitement and demand. Social media is suddenly the hottest thing going. And it is both challenging and reinvigorating an industry that, by many accounts, had become moribund next to Web marketing. Authors Brian Solis and Deirdre Breakenridge sum up what’s happening in the title of their bestselling book: Putting the Public Back in Public Relations: How Social Media Is Reinventing the Aging Business of PR.

They got it half right, I think. Social media is certainly putting the public back in public relations—along with a lot of other disciplines (sales, marketing, advertising and customer service). However, I’m not sure social media is reinventing the PR business. More likely, social media is gaining traction because smart PR people recognize that, number one, it falls under the public relations umbrella and, two, it provides a fantastic opportunity to use technology to connect with audiences like never before. Particularly since the linchpins of the PR trade—media relations and the press release—are quickly working their way to the communications morgue.

Of course, marketing, advertising and IT folks can argue that they should “control” social media. But social media needs surpass those areas. And those other disciplines haven’t mastered the crucial skills of empathy, constituency building and comprehensive communications strategy and execution as PR professionals have. (The good ones, anyway.)

Public relations is entitled to be the ring leader for social media activities, as Jason Falls, Jason Keath and other social media pundits have observed. It’s already happening—because public relations has a proven track record in serving as a management function that establishes and maintains the relationships necessary for an organization’s survival. At the same time, a lot of social media experts are running circles around PR people, who haven’t grasped some of the fundamental differences needed for social media vs. traditional public relations.

The Challenge For Social Media

Social media matches up well with the standard definition of PR. It’s also easy for people to grasp the underlying principles behind social media, which boil down to the three T’s: Trust, Transparency and Two-Way Communications. Yet social media faces huge hurdles: convincing management of its overall value, and establishing a seat at the boardroom table.

While some companies have embraced social media, the vast majority are taking a more cautious approach. They are asking whether social media is a fad, or if it’s here to stay—and in the meantime relying in large part on time-tested techniques for gaining awareness and responding to customers and prospects. Social media frankly scares the bejesus out of many companies, and for good reasons—lack of control, unknown ROI, insufficient manpower and legal risks, to name a few.

So now we’re at this odd but exciting crossroads. In this direction is public relations, a known and proven entity, albeit dusty and boring and in need of a shot of adrenaline. Over here, we have this shiny new contender, social media. Seemingly the Holy Grail of Communications, it is fueled by constant barrage of messages, tools that primarily belong to someone else and mostly younger people without the scars to prove their worth. It feels a whole lot like the mid-to-late ‘90s, when crazy young bucks (like me) were starting web design firms and ranting like street preachers about how the Internet would change everything. It’s irrational exuberance all over again.

Do All Roads Lead To…Social Relations?

Where is all this headed?

Like Reese’s Peanut Butter Cups, public relations and social media seem destined to join forces. They are two great things that work even better together. PR desperately needed a hero, and social media swooped in like Superwoman at just the right moment—offering cheap, ubiquitous, direct communications tools to battle the Great Recession.

Ironically, the savvy new social media experts realized they needed PR to broaden their appeal beyond Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, YouTube and blogs (the social media equivalents of press releases). They are now seeking the maturity and wisdom of PR practitioners, as well as pursuing broad acceptance by people who control the communications’ purse strings.

PR and social media are in a virtual online horse race, without a clear winner. Google “public relations” and you get 35,000,000 results. “Social media” is close behind with 31,000,000 results. Note that the latter results were garnered in the last 2-3 years, compared to PR’s 100+. Granted, the web as we know it has been around since about 1996—which should still give PR a much larger lead than it currently enjoys.

My solution is for public relations and social media to walk down the aisle and join in holy matrimony as social relations. Google search results for “social relations”: 4,170,000

I predict that both of these professions can’t co-exist forever. Recall that social media started its short life as “social marketing.” Since those golden days of yesteryear, circa 2008, it has already had an identity crisis.

Both of these crafts/professions/disciplines would benefit and profit from a more unified moniker. Public relations is too stodgy to carry the flag for both, in my opinion. Hey kids, what would you rather study in college—social media or PR?

On the other hand, social media is too self-referential to tools (online media properties) vs. the actual usage of the tools and the holistic approach to “social media” as an evolutionary communications practice.

Social relations has a nice ring to it. Public media? Not so much. Ditto for social media relations.

Social should move to the forefront, replacing public and representing the new overarching framework for creating ongoing dialogues between companies and consumers.

Convincing proponents in either camp to accept a combined term will be challenging. PR will argue that it’s the proven profession. Social media will claim it is usurping the “old man.” But both can’t continue without forfeiting certain bragging rights and revenue to the opposing side. Years ago, integrated marketing was all the rage, then vanished when the Internet showed up. Suddenly everything splintered, with web design and later SEO firms and other specialists taking away big chunks of creativity, production and money from advertising, PR and marketing agencies.

If PR firms aren’t careful, they stand to lose out to social media experts. Likewise, social media professionals are at risk for becoming niche players.

Social relations would be the start of a beautiful new partnership, with companies and consumers as the real winners in a new era of open communications.

You May Also Like

  • Kathy Rowan. APR

    Great piece, Brandon. PR practitioners should embrace social media and they better get up to speed quickly if they haven't already. It's not a fad. When you hear a PR practitioner describe it as such, you can be assured that he/she simply doesn't understand how to use it – always easier to dismiss rather than learn.

    I agree that social media belongs under the PR umbrella. But, changing the profession's name? You better get your best 'persuasive tactics' game on because you'll have an APR-manned picket line a mile long outside your office :)

  • http://www.WebBusinessFreedom.com BrandonUttley

    Thanks, Kathy.

    I understand I might stir up a hornet's nest of opinions, which I think could actually be a good thing. PR has been around so long, it probably won't budge on naming rights.

  • http://imiphotography.com Andy Ciordia aka Ciordia9

    It's like finding drugs in the wild. Sure we had Penicillin but because we explore we find new plants to make into new medicines.

    PR, DM, SM, SR, it's all really “medicine”–we just keep finding new ways to engage/listen.

    Now I think the challenge is finding the rhythm to the holistic. The digital allows for real-time, easy listening, targeted response. The physical offers something to hold, the hand-shake, the sitdown, the smile. They are all forms of engagement but they really have to be interwoven to get the most traction. Those who pigeonhole themselves like you've mentioned are in for a rough road.

    I love new tools and we've just begun to explore the social amazon that exists.

  • http://www.WebBusinessFreedom.com BrandonUttley

    Jim,

    Public relations has always attempted to influence the entire spectrum of communications–from advertising to marketing and customer service.

    Perhaps I went too far in suggesting only PR people have mastered empathy. Clearly, many have not. What I really meant to convey (as you have) is that without empathy, social media fails. And some disciplines are better than others at grasping this essential concept. It's not always about math and “hitting the numbers”–if you aren't acknowledging people's feelings and making organizational changes in the process.

    I really like your definition of social media as a “hybrid.” I will argue that makes social relations relevant as an emerging philosophy.

    The thing I'd hate to see personally is the PR profession (or other communications professionals) somehow managing to marginalize social media. It's too big (to use your words) for that to happen. The way I see it, social media (the practice of it, not the tools) is the future of public relations. And that future is already here.

  • http://www.WebBusinessFreedom.com BrandonUttley

    Andy,

    You've hit on a beautiful analogy.

    There will indeed always be the old things and the new ones. It seems to me that from here on out, there must be social aspects or considerations to successful communications efforts. Social media in that regard has been like discovering a wonder drug.

    And you also point out nicely that at its best, social media is a facilitator for real-world encounters. Digital will never fully replace the power of physical contact, but both can and must co-exist in the new media jungle.

  • http://twitter.com/LeliaKate Lelia King

    Brandon, thank you for this thoughtful post. I think students who study PR, social media, or any type of communications in college need to understand that it's not about the tools. Tools will continue to develop and change. It's much more about the “relationship” factor – how will you help businesses and organizations come up with a strategy for building relationships with the people they care about? I wish students today would take less classes about how to use the tools, and learn more about how to think strategically.

  • coreycreed

    Who exactly should “own” social media in a large business?

    Great question, Brandon. I think every business struggles with that. You recommend PR. That does seem wise. I'm warming up to the idea.

    But others recommend Marketing, Customer Service, etc. I like the idea making a new box on the organizational chart. Call it Social Relations, or whatever. But it needs to have strong connections to Marketing, Customer Service, Legal, etc. In fact, you could probably move the PR people into this new department. Maybe that's the same thing as what you are recommending.

  • ryanknott

    My main concern with this concept is that “old school” PR professionals might see a melding of social media and PR as more of a way to restrain and control social media's rise rather than embracing it as a new strategy.

    Your post makes several references to press releases as being the staple of the PR practitioner's tool chest, but I have to believe that any PR pro out there who thinks PR starts and ends with press releases probably hasn't been doing a very good job of it anyway, and will do the same poor job with social media.

    A some other comments have noted, social media is a unique blend. It's marketing, public relations, personal relations and more. Done well, it should involve more listening than speaking.

    To make the move to social relations, PR pros will have to embrace the new rather than trying to force social media to conform to the old.

  • http://www.WebBusinessFreedom.com BrandonUttley

    Corey, I am thinking that public relations as we know it is experiencing a huge shift in thinking and practice, as a result of social media. And to me it makes sense to start talking about one thing (social relations) as opposed to two things, which essentially have the same goals.

  • http://www.WebBusinessFreedom.com BrandonUttley

    Lelia, you're absolutely right. Yet surprisingly, I find many students I talk to aren't even learning about the tools right now, much less the strategy. Colleges and universities are understandably playing catch-up. The old textbooks are out-of-date.

    My feeling is that “social” is here to stay, no matter what no tools come out to support relationship building efforts.

  • http://www.WebBusinessFreedom.com BrandonUttley

    Ryan, thanks for your comments.

    As I reflect on my 22+year PR career, I can say from experience that no matter how in-depth PR campaigns get, the majority of clients I've dealt with have seen it foremost as media relations. Those days are coming to an end, I think. And PR people definitely have to rise to the occasion and embrace newer means of making connections—and educating clients about how social media is different than one-way messages. Listening is utterly crucial—well said.

  • http://twitter.com/spiraleyezed Marc Pitre

    Great article Brandon. Thanks for sharing… I'll pass it along through my Social outlets.

  • http://www.WebBusinessFreedom.com BrandonUttley

    Thanks, Marc!

  • coreycreed

    Nice idea. I like it. I wonder if it is really a merging. Perhaps social media is just getting so big that PR is going away. (sorry)

  • mohsinmillwala

    Every one are except for this website is a number one site in the world. Categories are (World information). Millwala.Com

  • http://twitter.com/zackself Zack Self

    Interesting. A lot to read on a Friday afternoon. Think I'll come back to it in the AM. :)
    My sense is that PR is flailing because the traditional media is drying up. Sharp declines in audience lead to sharp declines in revenue which in turn lead to sharp declines in media contacts. PR was simply there to get the story out to an audience. SM connects with the audience. The skills needed to make a good pitch are badly needed in the SM world. my 2 cents.

  • http://www.WebBusinessFreedom.com BrandonUttley

    Zack, thanks for your comments. These are on track. I do think PR people have tried to “connect with the audience” for a long time, but they were often held back because they were required to be in the background. One thing social media has done is lifted the veil in many cases, which is remarkable.

  • http://twitter.com/beccabernstein beccabernstein

    Everyone wants to own social media. And why not? It’s where marketing dollars are headed. And I think whatever discipline you live in, you’ll vote for that as the likely home of the new world of communications. But the thing is, no one owns social media. Not one department or a particular discipline. It’s owned by the consumer. True, you may own your accounts and have the ability to craft messages or remove comments but the real power is the in the hand of your audience. And while we can classify it internally however we want, the consumer really doesn’t care.

  • http://allaboutfocus.com Patrick Allmond

    I'd like your opinion on something. When and where did Social Media arrive?

    I've always seriously wondered because – one day we had it, and the day before we didn't. My point being – we have being doing what is called “Social Media” now for a long time. It is just communication eletronically. There are mediums that have been around online for a long time that are now being called social. Blogging, mailing list services, wordpress, etc. I've heard all of these being called the new social tools.

    Is Social Media a vehicle for Marketing, PR, Sales, relationship management rather than being any of those things? I see it as more of a channel for anything rather than an endpoint.

  • http://www.WebBusinessFreedom.com BrandonUttley

    Patrick,

    I personally think when Facebook opened up their platform to allow third-party applications (sometime in 2008 if I recall correctly), that was the tipping point. During the same timeframe, Twitter was taking hold and did the same thing–allowed developers to make apps to take advantage of their platform.

    You're right in one sense. Blogs were around awhile, but we didn't really think of them as “social” so much. But now they are considered central to “social media” efforts by most experts. I think the integration of these other platforms into blogs, in addition to the comments you can enable, elevated the status of blogs per se. Plus, unlike with other services you can actually control the look-and-feel of your blog and own the content.

    What I'd like to know is, who came up with the term social media. We started calling it “social networking,” then virtually overnight it became social media. To your point, what day was that exactly?

    As for your second question, that's harder for me to answer. Social media is a new way of looking at (and conducting) communications between organizations and individuals. It's personal, direct, bi-way (or multi-directional) and instantaneous. The underlying rules of social media are around being transparent and empathetic. Certainly other professions weren't built on that principle (advertising comes to mind).

    Thanks for the thought-provoking questions!

  • http://www.eastonsweb.com jeaston

    As the goodfella's used to say, “give it a name…” With your naming convention I do not think you are attempting to own the or control the space. It seems that Social Relations would be an appropriate term for the group of people who would use the social web as a tactic in a comprehensive public relations plan. Hmmm, perhaps a few more terms are in order:

    Social Recruiting or Social HR
    Social Customer Service (that sounds crazy)
    Social Media Optimization (SMO)
    …?

    On the subject of change and corporate types, “getting it”. Anyone unwilling to change has sown the seeds of their extinction. It is human nature to want to remain comfortable even to the point of inaction in the face of a changing world. Often today's dinosaurs were yesterdays innovators. I suppose its nature's way. Only a scant few are willing to risk everything to be remarkable and even fewer willing to detach themselves from what they suffered long and hard to acquire.

    “The advancing person willingly creates change because the world is not yet how he wants it” – Spencer Johnson

  • http://www.WebBusinessFreedom.com BrandonUttley

    John, thanks for your comments. I like your definition of social relations as being part of a comprehensive public relations plan. Yet I believe that long term, social will take over from where “public” relations has led us to date. Social media is fundamentally changing the rules of corporate/organizational communications.

  • http://twitter.com/365DaysofStyle 365DaysofStyle

    Well-written and well-thought-out article.

    I certainly agree. I think that this has been coming for a long time, and just like anything, there were many early adopters, who “knew” this long ago, and the rest of the world is sitting up one day and saying “Where did this come from?”

    As a fortune cookie might say, “It takes years of work to become an overnight success.”

    I find it amusing that people need to be told to consider ALL the tools at their disposal, rather than choosing one arbitrarily over another.

  • http://www.WebBusinessFreedom.com BrandonUttley

    Thanks for commenting.

    The irony is, social media is sort of an “overnight success.” It has taken hold in about two years (i.e., social media as we know it), vs. decades for PR.

    And social media is not just about the tools, it's about the changing philosophy on how companies communicate and what people expect.

  • http://www.naturalk9supplies.com/Dog-Food/orijen-senior.aspx Orijen Senior Dog Food

    Attempting to ‘own’ the space in one section of the shop. And I sincerely don’t think it’s PR that should ‘own’ it.

  • Charlotte

    Brilliant piece here Brandon, I actually run my own social media public relations company called “Social Relations” and this was exactly the thinking behind the name. Hopefully, marketing and PR along with other disciplines can work peacefully under the umbrella of social media but I doubt it. PR has always been about communicating with our client’s publics and raising companies reputations, using various channels and now social media is just another channel. This is what we’ve been doing for years and usually we try and get coverage without buying it, whereas advertising and marketing often buy their OTS. The only thing that worries me is companies are turning to PR agencies to manage their social media and a lot of PR agencies aren’t grasping it with two hands yet. I think this amount of fear from CEO’s gives PRs an incredibly opportunity and we have to make sure we’re ready for it!

    Charlotte Pittock-Holdsworth
    charlotte@socialrelations.co.uk

  • http://www.WebBusinessFreedom.com BrandonUttley

    Charlotte, I agree that many PR practitioners still have a long way to go in doing social media well and proving its worth to the c-suite. But it is an exciting challenge that I feel PR people are well suited to embrace.